Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using convolution algorithm in" » "coder using evolution algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using coevolutionary algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using construction algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using convolutional algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder voting convolution algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder in convolution algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using convolution algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using convolution algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder using convolution algorithm with" (Expand search), "coders using convolution algorithm in" (Expand search), "cover using convolution algorithm in" (Expand search), "code using convolution algorithm in" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using convolution algorithm in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using convolution algorithm in\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using convolution algorithm in ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using convolution algorithm in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.