Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using conditional duration programming" » "coder using conditional correlation programming" (Expand search), "coder using conditional random programming" (Expand search), "coder using conditional education programming" (Expand search), "coder using conditional creation programming" (Expand search), "coder using conditional educational programming" (Expand search), "coder using conventional duration programming" (Expand search), "coder using traditional duration programming" (Expand search), "coder using convolutional duration programming" (Expand search), "coders using conditional duration programming" (Expand search), "cover using conditional duration programming" (Expand search), "code using conditional duration programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using conditional duration programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using conditional duration programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using conditional duration programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using conditional duration programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.