Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using conditional control programming" » "coder using condition control programming" (Expand search), "coder using conditioner control programming" (Expand search), "coder using conditions control programming" (Expand search), "coder using conditional control programme" (Expand search), "coder using conditional cultural programming" (Expand search), "coder using conditional control program" (Expand search), "coder using conventional control programming" (Expand search), "coder using traditional control programming" (Expand search), "coder using convolutional control programming" (Expand search), "coders using conditional control programming" (Expand search), "cover using conditional control programming" (Expand search), "code using conditional control programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using conditional control programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using conditional control programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using conditional control programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using conditional control programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.