Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using coding logarithmic function" » "coder using in logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder using on logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder using modified logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder using coping logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder using coating logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder using cooking logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coders using coding logarithmic function" (Expand search), "cover using coding logarithmic function" (Expand search), "code using coding logarithmic function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using coding logarithmic function") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using coding logarithmic function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using coding logarithmic function ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using coding logarithmic function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.