Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using coding decoding discourse" » "coder using coding becoming discourse" (Expand search), "coder using coding reading discourse" (Expand search), "coder using coding teaching discourse" (Expand search), "coder using encoding decoding discourse" (Expand search), "coder using reading decoding discourse" (Expand search), "coder using joint decoding discourse" (Expand search), "coder using coping decoding discourse" (Expand search), "coder using coating decoding discourse" (Expand search), "coder using cooking decoding discourse" (Expand search), "coders using coding decoding discourse" (Expand search), "cover using coding decoding discourse" (Expand search), "code using coding decoding discourse" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using coding decoding discourse") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using coding decoding discourse\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using coding decoding discourse ) OR ( on python python python programming ))*.