Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using binary semidefinite programming" » "coder using linear semidefinite programming" (Expand search), "coder using in semidefinite programming" (Expand search), "coder using via semidefinite programming" (Expand search), "coder using ordinary semidefinite programming" (Expand search), "coders using binary semidefinite programming" (Expand search), "cover using binary semidefinite programming" (Expand search), "code using binary semidefinite programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using binary semidefinite programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using binary semidefinite programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using binary semidefinite programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using binary semidefinite programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.