Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using binary dinamic programming" » "coder using binary dynamic programming" (Expand search), "coder using binary dynamic programing" (Expand search), "coder using binary genetic programming" (Expand search), "coder using binary dynamics programming" (Expand search), "coder using binaria dinamica programming" (Expand search), "coder using ordinary dinamic programming" (Expand search), "coders using binary dinamic programming" (Expand search), "cover using binary dinamic programming" (Expand search), "code using binary dinamic programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using binary dinamic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using binary dinamic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using binary dinamic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using binary dinamic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.