Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using ascent algorithm in" » "coder using descent algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using descent algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using set algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using scent algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using ancient algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using agent algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using ascent algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using ascent algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder using ascent algorithm with" (Expand search), "coders using ascent algorithm in" (Expand search), "cover using ascent algorithm in" (Expand search), "code using ascent algorithm in" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using ascent algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using ascent algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using ascent algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using ascent algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.