Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using aggregation algorithms in" » "coder using segmentation algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using regression algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using allocation algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using aggregate algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using aggregated algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder and aggregation algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using aggregation algorithms and" (Expand search), "coder using aggregation algorithms _" (Expand search), "coders using aggregation algorithms in" (Expand search), "cover using aggregation algorithms in" (Expand search), "code using aggregation algorithms in" (Expand search)
"xapi with python python programming" » "xapi with pythons python programming" (Expand search), "xapi with piton python programming" (Expand search), "xapi with pitons python programming" (Expand search), "xai with python python programming" (Expand search), "pi with python python programming" (Expand search), "ai with python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using aggregation algorithms in\") OR (\"xapi with python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using aggregation algorithms in ) OR ( xapi with python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using aggregation algorithms in") OR ("xapi with python python programming"))*.