Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder training induces coverage complexity" » "coder training induces average complexity" (Expand search), "coder training induces governance complexity" (Expand search), "coder training induces convergence complexity" (Expand search), "coder training induced coverage complexity" (Expand search), "coder training reduces coverage complexity" (Expand search), "coder training devices coverage complexity" (Expand search), "coder training ensure coverage complexity" (Expand search), "coder training induces collagen complexity" (Expand search), "coder training values coverage complexity" (Expand search), "power training induces coverage complexity" (Expand search), "model training induces coverage complexity" (Expand search), "under training induces coverage complexity" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder training induces coverage complexity\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder training induces coverage complexity ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder training induces coverage complexity") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.