Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder strings in algorithm in" » "model strings in algorithm in" (Expand search), "encoded strings in algorithm in" (Expand search), "closed strings in algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder strings in algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder strings an algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder strings on algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder strings in algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder strings in algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder strings in algorithm with" (Expand search), "coder springs in algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder stings in algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder settings in algorithm in" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder strings in algorithm in\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder strings in algorithm in ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder strings in algorithm in") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.