Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder specification mining algorithm in" » "coder specialization mining algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder specification during algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder specification modeling algorithm in" (Expand search), "model specification mining algorithm in" (Expand search), "code specifications mining algorithm in" (Expand search), "under specification mining algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder specification mining algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder specification training algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder specification making algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder specification mining algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder specification mining algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder specification mining algorithm with" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder specification mining algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder specification mining algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder specification mining algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder specification mining algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.