Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder specification and algorithm in" » "model specification and algorithm in" (Expand search), "code specifications and algorithm in" (Expand search), "under specification and algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder specification of algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder speciation and algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder specificity and algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder specification and algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder specification an algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder specification and algorithmic in" (Expand search), "coder specification and algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder specification and algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder specification and algorithm with" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder specification and algorithm in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder specification and algorithm in\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder specification and algorithm in ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder specification and algorithm in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.