Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder spatialization found algorithm in" » "models spatialization found algorithm in" (Expand search), "body spatialization found algorithm in" (Expand search), "code specialization found algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder spatialization sound algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder spatialization and algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder spatialization on algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder spatialization found algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder spatialization bound algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder spatialization bound algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder spatialization found algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder spatialization found algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder spatialization found algorithm with" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder spatialization found algorithm in") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder spatialization found algorithm in\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder spatialization found algorithm in ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder spatialization found algorithm in") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.