Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder segmentation with lingual programming" » "coder segmentation with lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation with language programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation with linear programming" (Expand search), "color segmentation with lingual programming" (Expand search), "over segmentation with lingual programming" (Expand search), "gender segmentation with lingual programming" (Expand search), "coder augmentation with lingual programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation in lingual programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation of lingual programming" (Expand search)
"python on python python programming" » "python on pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python on piton python programming" (Expand search), "python on pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python of python python programming" (Expand search), "python in python python programming" (Expand search), "python and python python programming" (Expand search), "python _ python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder segmentation with lingual programming\") OR (\"python on python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder segmentation with lingual programming ) OR ( python on python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder segmentation with lingual programming") OR ("python on python python programming"))*.