Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder segmentation with generic programming" » "coder segmentation with genetic programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation with geometric programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation with generative programming" (Expand search), "color segmentation with generic programming" (Expand search), "over segmentation with generic programming" (Expand search), "gender segmentation with generic programming" (Expand search), "coder augmentation with generic programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation in generic programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation of generic programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation with general programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation with genomic programming" (Expand search)
"python using lines python programming" » "python usando lines python programming" (Expand search), "python coding lines python programming" (Expand search), "action using lines python programming" (Expand search), "python using in python programming" (Expand search), "python using line python programming" (Expand search), "python using splines python programming" (Expand search), "python using linear python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder segmentation with generic programming") OR ("python using lines python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder segmentation with generic programming\") OR (\"python using lines python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder segmentation with generic programming ) OR ( python using lines python programming ))*.