Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder segmentation python in instruction" » "coder segmentation method in instruction" (Expand search), "coder segmentation methods in instruction" (Expand search), "coder segmentation on in instruction" (Expand search), "color segmentation python in instruction" (Expand search), "over segmentation python in instruction" (Expand search), "gender segmentation python in instruction" (Expand search), "coder segmentation python in instructions" (Expand search), "coder segmentation python on instruction" (Expand search), "coder segmentation python an instruction" (Expand search), "coder segmentation python and instruction" (Expand search), "coder segmentation python _ instruction" (Expand search), "coder segmentation python of instruction" (Expand search)
"python in python python programming" » "python in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python in piton python programming" (Expand search), "python in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python and python python programming" (Expand search), "python _ python python programming" (Expand search), "python of python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder segmentation python in instruction\") OR (\"python in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder segmentation python in instruction ) OR ( python in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder segmentation python in instruction") OR ("python in python python programming"))*.