Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder segmentation on coding objects" » "color segmentation on coding objects" (Expand search), "over segmentation on coding objects" (Expand search), "gender segmentation on coding objects" (Expand search), "coder segmentation of coding objects" (Expand search), "coder segmentation in coding objects" (Expand search), "coder segmentation and coding objects" (Expand search), "coder segmentation on moving objects" (Expand search), "coder segmentation on counting objects" (Expand search), "coder segmentation on cutting objects" (Expand search), "coder segmentation non coding objects" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder segmentation on coding objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder segmentation on coding objects ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder segmentation on coding objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.