Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder segmentation inspired algorithm in" » "coder segmentation based algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder segmentation obtained algorithm in" (Expand search), "color segmentation inspired algorithm in" (Expand search), "over segmentation inspired algorithm in" (Expand search), "gender segmentation inspired algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder segmentation inspired algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder segmentation inspired algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder segmentation inspired algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder segmentation inspired algorithm with" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder segmentation inspired algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder segmentation inspired algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder segmentation inspired algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder segmentation inspired algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.