Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder segmentation by conic programming" » "color segmentation by conic programming" (Expand search), "over segmentation by conic programming" (Expand search), "gender segmentation by conic programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation by logic programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation by cone programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation by convex programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation of conic programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation in conic programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation _ conic programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation by chronic programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation by colonic programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation by conkin programming" (Expand search)
"python in python python programming" » "python in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python in piton python programming" (Expand search), "python in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python and python python programming" (Expand search), "python _ python python programming" (Expand search), "python c python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder segmentation by conic programming\") OR (\"python in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder segmentation by conic programming ) OR ( python in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder segmentation by conic programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))*.