Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder segmentation by adaptative programming" » "coder segmentation by adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation by adaptation programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation by adaptive reprogramming" (Expand search), "color segmentation by adaptative programming" (Expand search), "over segmentation by adaptative programming" (Expand search), "gender segmentation by adaptative programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation of adaptative programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation in adaptative programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation _ adaptative programming" (Expand search), "coder segmentation an adaptative programming" (Expand search)
"python in python python programming" » "python in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python in piton python programming" (Expand search), "python in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python and python python programming" (Expand search), "python _ python python programming" (Expand search), "python c python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder segmentation by adaptative programming\") OR (\"python in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder segmentation by adaptative programming ) OR ( python in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder segmentation by adaptative programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))*.