Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder scale testing low coverage" » "coder scale fishing low coverage" (Expand search), "coder scale using low coverage" (Expand search), "coder scale tests low coverage" (Expand search), "coder scale testing code coverage" (Expand search), "coder scale testing and coverage" (Expand search), "coder scale testing in coverage" (Expand search), "cover scale testing low coverage" (Expand search), "color scale testing low coverage" (Expand search), "model scale testing low coverage" (Expand search), "coder scale testing flow coverage" (Expand search), "coder scale treating low coverage" (Expand search), "coder scale testing long coverage" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder scale testing low coverage\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder scale testing low coverage ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder scale testing low coverage") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.