Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder routing grasp logarithmic functions" » "coder routing grasp logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder routing and logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder routing dual logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder routing exact logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "power routing grasp logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "node routing grasp logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "powder grouting grasp logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder using grasp logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder cutting grasp logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder routing fast logarithmic functions" (Expand search)
"in pitons python python programming" » "in pitons pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in pigeons python python programming" (Expand search), "in picos python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder routing grasp logarithmic functions") OR ("in pitons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder routing grasp logarithmic functions\") OR (\"in pitons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder routing grasp logarithmic functions ) OR ( in pitons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder routing grasp logarithmic functions") OR ("in pitons python python programming"))*.