Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder reusing hardware algorithm group" » "coder reusing hardware algorithms group" (Expand search), "coder reusing aware algorithm group" (Expand search), "coder reusing aware algorithms group" (Expand search), "coder using hardware algorithm group" (Expand search), "coder processing hardware algorithm group" (Expand search), "coder learning hardware algorithm group" (Expand search), "coder reusing hardware algorithm from" (Expand search), "coder reusing hardware algorithm graph" (Expand search), "coder reusing hardware algorithm grg" (Expand search), "code using hardware algorithm group" (Expand search), "codes using hardware algorithm group" (Expand search), "coders using hardware algorithm group" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder reusing hardware algorithm group\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder reusing hardware algorithm group ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder reusing hardware algorithm group") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.