Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder recursive type algorithm in" » "novel recursive type algorithm in" (Expand search), "control recursive type algorithm in" (Expand search), "modelo recursivo type algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder recursive types algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discursive type algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder recursive stage algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder recursive the algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder recursive tree algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder recursive time algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder recursive type algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder recursive type algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder recursive type algorithm with" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder recursive type algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder recursive type algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder recursive type algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.