Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder processual adequation algorithm in" » "coder processual adequado algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processual adequacao algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processual adequada algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processual adaptation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processual adaptation algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder processual detection algorithm in" (Expand search), "poder processual adequation algorithm in" (Expand search), "modelo processual adequation algorithm in" (Expand search), "codigo processual adequation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processual adequation algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder processual adequation algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder processual adequation algorithm with" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder processual adequation algorithm in") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder processual adequation algorithm in\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder processual adequation algorithm in ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder processual adequation algorithm in") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.