Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder processing embedded in programming" » "coder processors embedded in programming" (Expand search), "coder pricing embedded in programming" (Expand search), "coder probing embedded in programming" (Expand search), "cider processing embedded in programming" (Expand search), "powder processing embedded in programming" (Expand search), "power processing embedded in programming" (Expand search), "coder processing embedded and programming" (Expand search), "coder processing embedded _ programming" (Expand search), "coder processing embedded c programming" (Expand search)
"api pythons python python programming" » "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder processing embedded in programming") OR ("api pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder processing embedded in programming\") OR (\"api pythons python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder processing embedded in programming ) OR ( api pythons python python programming ))*.