Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder processing descent algorithm in" » "coder processing recent algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processing design algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processing event algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processing set algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processing test algorithm in" (Expand search), "cider processing descent algorithm in" (Expand search), "powder processing descent algorithm in" (Expand search), "power processing descent algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processing descent algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder processing descent algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder processing descent algorithm with" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder processing descent algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder processing descent algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder processing descent algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.