Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder processing descent algorithm in" » "coder processing recent algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processing design algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processing event algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processing set algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processing test algorithm in" (Expand search), "cider processing descent algorithm in" (Expand search), "powder processing descent algorithm in" (Expand search), "power processing descent algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder processing descent algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder processing descent algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder processing descent algorithm with" (Expand search)
"api pitons python python programming" » "api pitons pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api citons python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoni python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder processing descent algorithm in") OR ("api pitons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder processing descent algorithm in\") OR (\"api pitons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder processing descent algorithm in ) OR ( api pitons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder processing descent algorithm in") OR ("api pitons python python programming"))*.