Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder precoding using flow coverage" » "coherent precoding using flow coverage" (Expand search), "linear precoding using flow coverage" (Expand search), "coder decoding using flow coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding using flow coverage" (Expand search), "coder breeding using flow coverage" (Expand search), "coder precoding using low coverage" (Expand search), "coder precoding using cloud coverage" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder precoding using flow coverage") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder precoding using flow coverage\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder precoding using flow coverage ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder precoding using flow coverage") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.