Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder planning decision algorithm complexity" » "coder planning decision algorithms complexity" (Expand search), "coder planning decision algorithmic complexity" (Expand search), "coder planning division algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "coder planning detection algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "coder planning detection algorithms complexity" (Expand search), "coder planning design algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "coder making decision algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "coder binding decision algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "modern planning decision algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "border planning decision algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "power planning decision algorithm complexity" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder planning decision algorithm complexity\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder planning decision algorithm complexity ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder planning decision algorithm complexity") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.