Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder over sampling to coverage" » "coder water sampling to coverage" (Expand search), "coder under sampling to coverage" (Expand search), "coder oversampling _ to coverage" (Expand search), "coder over sampling _ coverage" (Expand search), "coder over sampling in coverage" (Expand search), "coder over sampling time coverage" (Expand search), "coder over sampling low coverage" (Expand search), "coder over sampling its coverage" (Expand search), "coder over sampling mgo coverage" (Expand search), "codes over sampling to coverage" (Expand search), "cover over sampling to coverage" (Expand search), "power over sampling to coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder over sampling to coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder over sampling to coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder over sampling to coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.