Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder object making algorithms in" » "coder object mining algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder object tracking algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder object matching algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder object marking algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder object taking algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder object ranking algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder object making algorithms and" (Expand search), "coder object making algorithms _" (Expand search), "model object making algorithms in" (Expand search), "copper objects making algorithms in" (Expand search), "older objects making algorithms in" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder object making algorithms in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder object making algorithms in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder object making algorithms in ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.