Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder modern coding the factor" » "coder modern housing the factor" (Expand search), "coder modern code the factor" (Expand search), "coder modern china the factor" (Expand search), "powder modern coding the factor" (Expand search), "code moderne coding the factor" (Expand search), "under modern coding the factor" (Expand search), "coder modern decoding the factor" (Expand search), "coder modern encoding the factor" (Expand search), "coder modern aiding the factor" (Expand search), "coder modern coding the factors" (Expand search), "coder modern coding the factory" (Expand search), "coder modern coding the actor" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder modern coding the factor\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder modern coding the factor ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder modern coding the factor") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.