Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder modern coding functions predicted" » "coder modern coding functions predict" (Expand search), "coder modern coding function predicts" (Expand search), "coder modern coding functional predicates" (Expand search), "coder modern scoring functions predicted" (Expand search), "coder modern voting functions predicted" (Expand search), "coder modern coping function predicted" (Expand search), "coder modern housing functions predicted" (Expand search), "coder modern code functions predicted" (Expand search), "coder modern china functions predicted" (Expand search), "powder modern coding functions predicted" (Expand search), "code moderne coding functions predicted" (Expand search), "under modern coding functions predicted" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder modern coding functions predicted\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder modern coding functions predicted ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder modern coding functions predicted") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.