Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder modern coding functions predict" » "coder modern coding function prediction" (Expand search), "coder modern coding functions public" (Expand search), "coder modern coding functional prediction" (Expand search), "coder modern scoring functions predict" (Expand search), "coder modern voting functions predict" (Expand search), "coder modern coping function predict" (Expand search), "coder modern housing functions predict" (Expand search), "coder modern code functions predict" (Expand search), "coder modern china functions predict" (Expand search), "powder modern coding functions predict" (Expand search), "code moderne coding functions predict" (Expand search), "under modern coding functions predict" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder modern coding functions predict\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder modern coding functions predict ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder modern coding functions predict") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.