Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder modern coding functions deficits" » "coder modern coding function deficits" (Expand search), "coder modern coding functional deficits" (Expand search), "coder modern coding function deficit" (Expand search), "coder modern scoring functions deficits" (Expand search), "coder modern voting functions deficits" (Expand search), "coder modern coping function deficits" (Expand search), "coder modern housing functions deficits" (Expand search), "coder modern code functions deficits" (Expand search), "coder modern china functions deficits" (Expand search), "powder modern coding functions deficits" (Expand search), "code moderne coding functions deficits" (Expand search), "under modern coding functions deficits" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder modern coding functions deficits") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder modern coding functions deficits\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder modern coding functions deficits ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder modern coding functions deficits") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.