Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder modern coding data objects" » "coder modern housing data objects" (Expand search), "coder modern code data objects" (Expand search), "coder modern china data objects" (Expand search), "powder modern coding data objects" (Expand search), "code moderne coding data objects" (Expand search), "under modern coding data objects" (Expand search), "coder modern coding data subjects" (Expand search), "coder modern coding earth objects" (Expand search), "coder modern coding and objects" (Expand search), "coder modern encoding data objects" (Expand search), "coder modern closing data objects" (Expand search), "coder modern coding dna objects" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder modern coding data objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder modern coding data objects ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder modern coding data objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.