Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder modeling using algorithm aversion" » "coder modeling using algorithm operation" (Expand search), "coder modeling using algorithm design" (Expand search), "coder modeling using algorithm creation" (Expand search), "coder modeling using algorithms aversion" (Expand search), "coder modeling using algorithmic aversion" (Expand search), "coder modeling dosing algorithm aversion" (Expand search), "cover modeling using algorithm aversion" (Expand search), "cover modelling using algorithm aversion" (Expand search), "order modeling using algorithm aversion" (Expand search), "coder model using algorithm aversion" (Expand search), "coder models using algorithm aversion" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder modeling using algorithm aversion") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder modeling using algorithm aversion\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder modeling using algorithm aversion ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.