Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder loving discourse imperative programming" » "coder loving discourse generative programming" (Expand search), "coder loving discourse competitive programming" (Expand search), "coder loving discourse temperature programming" (Expand search), "coder loving discourse comparative programming" (Expand search), "coder loving discourse narrative programming" (Expand search), "coder loving discurso imperativos programming" (Expand search), "coder founding discourse imperative programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse imperative programming" (Expand search), "coder reading discourse imperative programming" (Expand search), "border living discourse imperative programming" (Expand search), "under moving discourse imperative programming" (Expand search), "older living discourse imperative programming" (Expand search)
"and python python python programming" » "and pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "and piton python python programming" (Expand search), "and pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder loving discourse imperative programming\") OR (\"and python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder loving discourse imperative programming ) OR ( and python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder loving discourse imperative programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))*.