Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder lovers's discourse declarative programming" » "coder lovers's discourse reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder lovers's discourse deliberative programming" (Expand search), "coder lovers's discourse comparative programming" (Expand search), "coder lovers's discourse demonstrative programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder women's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder other's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "poder lovers's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "codes lovers's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search), "coded lovers's discourse declarative programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder lovers's discourse declarative programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder lovers's discourse declarative programming ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder lovers's discourse declarative programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.