Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder lover's discourse object programming" » "coder lover's discourse subject programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse objective programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse content programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse objects programming" (Expand search), "coder lover's discourse about programming" (Expand search), "poder lover's discourse object programming" (Expand search), "codes lover's discourse object programming" (Expand search), "coded lover's discourse object programming" (Expand search), "coder lovers's discourse object programming" (Expand search), "coder cover's discourse object programming" (Expand search), "coder mover's discourse object programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder lover's discourse object programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder lover's discourse object programming ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder lover's discourse object programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.