Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder location sampling improvements in" » "coder location simulating improvements in" (Expand search), "coder location mapping improvement in" (Expand search), "coder location melting improvements in" (Expand search), "coder location sharing improvements in" (Expand search), "coder location sampling improvement in" (Expand search), "model location sampling improvements in" (Expand search), "over location sampling improvements in" (Expand search), "under location sampling improvements in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder location sampling improvements in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder location sampling improvements in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder location sampling improvements in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.