Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder learning functions algorithm composition" » "coder learning functions algorithmic composition" (Expand search), "coder learning functions algorithms competition" (Expand search), "coder learning functions algorithms computation" (Expand search), "coder learning function algorithm composition" (Expand search), "coder learning function algoeithm composition" (Expand search), "coder learning fractions algorithm composition" (Expand search), "coder teaching functions algorithm composition" (Expand search), "coder clearing function algorithm composition" (Expand search), "codes learning functions algorithm composition" (Expand search), "modern learning functions algorithm composition" (Expand search), "model learning functions algorithm composition" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder learning functions algorithm composition") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder learning functions algorithm composition\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder learning functions algorithm composition ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder learning functions algorithm composition") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.