Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder instruction in algorithmic binary" » "coder instruction in algorithm binary" (Expand search), "coder instruction in algorithmic bias" (Expand search), "coder instruction in algorithmic biases" (Expand search), "gender instruction in algorithmic binary" (Expand search), "code d'instruction in algorithmic binary" (Expand search), "peer instruction in algorithmic binary" (Expand search), "coder construction in algorithmic binary" (Expand search), "coder instruction and algorithmic binary" (Expand search), "coder instruction _ algorithmic binary" (Expand search), "coder instruction an algorithmic binary" (Expand search), "coder instruction on algorithmic binary" (Expand search)
"api with python python programming" » "api with pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api with piton python programming" (Expand search), "api with pitons python programming" (Expand search), "xapi with python python programming" (Expand search), "pi with python python programming" (Expand search), "ai with python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder instruction in algorithmic binary") OR ("api with python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder instruction in algorithmic binary\") OR (\"api with python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder instruction in algorithmic binary ) OR ( api with python python programming ))*.