Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder instruction in algorithm in" » "gender instruction in algorithm in" (Expand search), "code d'instruction in algorithm in" (Expand search), "peer instruction in algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder construction in algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder instruction and algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder instruction _ algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder instruction in algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder instruction an algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder instruction on algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder instruction in algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder instruction in algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder instruction in algorithm with" (Expand search)
"api pythons python python programming" » "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder instruction in algorithm in") OR ("api pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder instruction in algorithm in\") OR (\"api pythons python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder instruction in algorithm in ) OR ( api pythons python python programming ))*.