Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder in stone algorithm data" » "coder in the algorithm data" (Expand search), "coder in tree algorithm data" (Expand search), "coder in time algorithm data" (Expand search), "coder in stone algorithms data" (Expand search), "coder in stone algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder in stone algorithm with" (Expand search), "code in stone algorithm data" (Expand search), "codes in stone algorithm data" (Expand search), "poder in stone algorithm data" (Expand search), "coder in store algorithm data" (Expand search), "coder in stored algorithm data" (Expand search), "coder in state algorithm data" (Expand search)
"api pythons python python programming" » "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder in stone algorithm data") OR ("api pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in stone algorithm data\") OR (\"api pythons python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in stone algorithm data ) OR ( api pythons python python programming ))*.