Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder in objective algorithm by" » "coder in objective algorithms by" (Expand search), "coder in multiobjective algorithm by" (Expand search), "coder in competitive algorithm by" (Expand search), "coder an objective algorithm by" (Expand search), "coder on objective algorithm by" (Expand search), "coder and objective algorithm by" (Expand search), "coder in objective algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder in objective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder in objective algorithm ga" (Expand search), "code in objective algorithm by" (Expand search), "codes in objective algorithm by" (Expand search), "poder in objective algorithm by" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder in objective algorithm by") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in objective algorithm by\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in objective algorithm by ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder in objective algorithm by") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.