Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder in embedded linear programmin" » "coder in embedded linear programming" (Expand search), "coder in embedded nonlinear programming" (Expand search), "coder in embedded liver programmin" (Expand search), "coder in embedded linux programmin" (Expand search), "coder in embedded fiber programmin" (Expand search), "coder an embedded linear programmin" (Expand search), "coder of embedded linear programmin" (Expand search), "coder _ embedded linear programmin" (Expand search), "code in embedded linear programmin" (Expand search), "codes in embedded linear programmin" (Expand search), "poder in embedded linear programmin" (Expand search)
"api in python python programming" » "api in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api in piton python programming" (Expand search), "api in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api _ python python programming" (Expand search), "api an python python programming" (Expand search), "fpi in python python programming" (Expand search), "gpi in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder in embedded linear programmin") OR ("api in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in embedded linear programmin\") OR (\"api in python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in embedded linear programmin ) OR ( api in python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder in embedded linear programmin") OR ("api in python python programming"))*.