Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder in disruptive reactive programming" » "coder in disruptive objective programming" (Expand search), "coder in disruptive teaching programming" (Expand search), "coder in disruptive declarative programming" (Expand search), "coder in disruptive reaction programming" (Expand search), "coder in disruptive practices programming" (Expand search), "coder in disruptive narrative programming" (Expand search), "coder and disruptive reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder _ disruptive reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder of disruptive reactive programming" (Expand search), "code in disruptive reactive programming" (Expand search), "codes in disruptive reactive programming" (Expand search), "poder in disruptive reactive programming" (Expand search)
"api in python python programming" » "api in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api in piton python programming" (Expand search), "api in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api _ python python programming" (Expand search), "api an python python programming" (Expand search), "fpi in python python programming" (Expand search), "gpi in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder in disruptive reactive programming") OR ("api in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in disruptive reactive programming\") OR (\"api in python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in disruptive reactive programming ) OR ( api in python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder in disruptive reactive programming") OR ("api in python python programming"))*.